Unit 1: From Revolution to Constitution
Suggested Activities
Rufus King
Era 3: Revolution and the New Nation
- Rufus King represented Massachusetts in the Continental
Congress from 1784 to 1786 where, at age thirty-two,
he was one of the youngest delegates. Although King
began his service in the Continental Congress unconvinced
that major changes needed to be made to the Articles
of Confederation, his views became transformed during
the proceedings and he became a staunch advocate for
drafting a new Constitution. Read the Articles of Confederation
(available at http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/D/1776-1800/constitution/confart.htm)
and summarize the issues it addresses. According to
King and his supporters, what were the document's major
flaws?
[Standard 2historical research capabilities]
The Articles of Confederation, which served as the
first American constitution, were written soon after
the colonies declared independence from Great Britain
and established a confederation of sovereign states.
The Articles protected trade between the states and
guaranteed free movement of citizens and goods. They
called for a common defense and stated that states should
not form alliances that would be damaging to other states
or to the confederation. The Continental Congress, the
only manifestation of a central government, was empowered
by the Articles of Confederation to handle national
functions such as regulation of foreign affairs and
war, establishment and maintenance of the postal service,
control over Indian affairs, appointment of military
officers, and oversight of financial matters such as
currency valuation and procurement of loans.
The common cause of the Revolutionary War held the
confederation of states together, but the weaknesses
of the Articles of Confederation became acutely apparent
during the war's aftermath. The Congress was in debt
to other countries from the war and was unable to raise
the necessary money since the Articles did not give
Congress the authority for taxation. Spain and England
were interfering with interstate trade and the national
government had no means to combat this threat with a
national defense. In addition, fundamental items like
a standard currency (instead of separate currencies
for each state) and a national system of weights and
measures was sorely needed. It was clear that the central
government, as conceived in the Articles of Confederation,
lacked the authority needed to build a great nation.
Rufus King (17551827)
Gilbert Stuart (17551828)
Oil on striated panel, 18191820
Gift of the James Smithson Society
NPG.88.1
- King was an opponent of slavery and introduced
a resolution in the Continental Congress to prohibit
slavery in the Northwest Territory. King's resolution
became part of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. What
area of the United States comprised the Northwest Territory
at this time? Outline the states currently included
in the Northwest Territory on a map. What were the components
of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787? Explain the resulting
system of government and the provisions for statehood.
How was the issue of slavery handled?
[Standard 5historical issues-analysis and decision-making]
The Northwest Territory was the area of the American
frontier north of the Ohio River, south of the Great
Lakes, east of the Mississippi, and west of Pennsylvania
(present-day Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, and
Michigan). These lands were claimed by existing states
until 1780, at which time the states ceded these territories
to the central government. The Northwest Ordinance of
1787 established a framework for government in these
lands and outlined the necessary steps for parts of
the territory to be admitted as states to the Union.
Congress appointed a governor and panel of judges to
govern each district until its population of free adult
males reached five thousand. At this time, the district
would become a territory and could form its own representative
legislature. When a territory could claim a population
of sixty thousand, it could be admitted to statehood.
The ordinance of 1787 declared that the Northwest Territory
as a whole must eventually include a minimum of three
and a maximum of five states. It outlawed slavery from
these territories, and the resulting states remained
free from slavery forever. Almost twenty years later,
King denounced the Missouri Compromise, believing that
the issue of slavery could be settled only by immediate
compensated emancipation and colonization.
- Rufus King and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney were
the Federalist candidates for Vice President and President,
respectively, in the 1804 and 1808 elections. Who were
the Republican candidates they were running against
and what was the outcome of the two elections? Compare
the basic platforms of the Federalist and the Republican
parties. Which of these two parties is more closely
aligned to the political philosophies of the modern
Democratic Party? To the modern Republican Party? Explain
your answers.
[Standard 5historical issues-analysis and decision-making]
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and Rufus King ran against
Thomas Jefferson and George Clinton in 1804 and James
Madison and George Clinton in 1808. Jefferson and Clinton
carried fifteen of seventeen states in 1804 and Madison
and Clinton carried twelve of seventeen states in 1808.
The term "Federalist" was first used in
1787 to characterize supporters of the Constitution.
The Federalist Party, which held power from 1789 to1801,
advocated a strong central government and held a fairly
liberal interpretation of the Constitution. In fiscal
matters, Federalists supported the creation of a central
bank, the funding of Revolutionary War debts, and the
maintenance of a tax system. The Federalists were neutral
in the war between France and Great Britain in 1793,
supported the Jay Treaty of 1794, and sponsored the
Alien and Sedition Acts, security laws passed in expectation
of a war with France.
The Republican Party was the first American opposition
party and was powerful from 1801 to 1825. This party
was formed under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson,
and its tenets included the primacy of states' rights
and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Greatly
influenced by the egalitarian ideals espoused in the
French Revolution, the Republican Party opposed centralization
at the seat of power. Unlike the Federalists, the Republicans
supported France during the war with Great Britain,
opposed Jay's Treaty, and fought the Alien and Sedition
Acts.
|